Maybe heed a less from Revlon. Obviously they were ahead of their times because I also noticed their advertisement was a color ad plus it was on the inside cover of the magazine. They were ahead of their time back in 1957. If I am not mistaken, you tend to pay a higher dollar amount for advertisement based on where it is located in the periodical. Prime spot in a magazine that had more black and white advertisements than color ads. Kudos to you Revlon.
So back to the story at hand now. See, I told yo I can think abstract at times. I start off with one thought then it leads me to another thought but in the end it all seems to come together. I think I purchased a pretty good deal because I bought the 2 piece set for $3.99 @ Marshall's. I had to get out my magnifying glass to read the small print of the advertisement and it truly was a great deal because back in 1957 the ad reflects $0.75 for frosted nail enamel; $0.65 for nail enamel and then $1.35 for lipstick plus tax the ad also states. In 1957 a lipstick and nail enamel cost $2.00 plus tax. In 2019 a lipstick and nail enamel set cost me $3.99 plus tax. Now I know it costs more if you purchase them in a store and that they must have had a great buyout for them to sell at $3.99 @ Marshall's. I really was drawn to the set because I recognized a color of nail polish I used to wear a few years back and I remember from then that I liked not only the color of the nail polish but the name seemed to stay with me also. I tend to think yes if you pictured in my mind cherries in the snow that would be a lovely scene do you agree? The rich color of cherries set in the foreground of pristine white snow. That is how I am created to think. Some would say outside the box. That was my recent experience just from me looking at a periodical magazine from 1957.
![]() |
| I wore the lipstick the other day and I liked it. I finished polishing my nails with the nail enamel a few hours ago. Thanks Revlon for creating this color. |


No comments:
Post a Comment